Saturday 30 July 2011

The Man in the Grey Overalls

A man with grey overalls stood there stock-still and stared at the River. Looking at a ghost. Certainly not at the River, the houses beyond, the trees around him. Not the bench he was not sitting on. The pram, the same colour as his overalls, stood quietly. If there was a baby inside, it slept peacefully, silently. The feeling was of tragedy, of impending doom. Had he done something terrible? Was he about to?
She went home and briefly checked the local news, the police website. Nothing about a stolen baby, no baby thrown in the River. The next day she checked but there was nothing there. The man in the grey overalls and his quiet pram were uncomfortably forgotten.
Many weeks and days later, the right combination of day and hours occurred. Round the corner in the quiet small woodland, the man in the grey overalls reappeared. This time, she could see his face. He was in his late fifties. He wore his grief like a shroud. The pram was still grey, and quiet. She approached it, silently. He couldn’t see her, but he couldn’t have anyway. He stared right ahead. He was walking into a ghost. The baby was beautiful. One of those unreal babies that sleep peacefully and look like a white westerner’s idea of a cherubic angel.
The man stared ahead, pushed the pram.
His life partner had died, in a burning caravan, along with his son, and his son’s girlfriend – the baby’s mum.
He looked at the ghost of the fire, the screaming, his own desperation and then the realization that the baby slept quietly, in that boxed area, as yet unaffected by the fire. He looked at the ghost of himself, in the last impetus of life he’d ever had, tearing the door apart, getting the baby out, then switching off, looking at the Caravan burning, hearing the silenced screams. The baby still slept – unaware – blissful. Sirens. Firemen.
Time.
A shop, a grey pram, nappies, a woman who came in during the day, as he worked his work, got home, strolled with the pram, stopped in front of the river, and stared at the ghost.

Thursday 7 July 2011

Googlebloodyplus: bye bye before we even met properly

So, someone just shared with me a note from Google+. It presented itself like an email, so you open it. You read it, because it was sent to YOU; apparently. Then you realise you cannot comment on it, as you’re not in Google+.
But you read it nevertheless because of a very intrusive way of sharing. In Facebook, (or Diaspora, which I'm still hoping many Facebook friends will move to eventually) I can choose to see notifications in my email. Or not. In twitter, I can open the application and read tweets, open shared links. Or not. In Google, I get it in my Inbox. Or not.
I just unsubscribed from any further communication from Gmail+.

That’s a lid on the coffin for googleplus’ relationship with me.

Google+ Email Settings
Settings saved.
Unsubscribe from all Google+ email notifications
Don't unsubscribe. Continue sending email notifications to valsarno@gmail.com

Save
What is Google+?
With Google+, you'll immediately enjoy an enhanced experience from Google. It's the web made better by you and your friends.
Learn more or sign up now

Tuesday 5 July 2011

Should pregnant women be entitled to abuse their bodies?

I find myself trying to vocalise my opinions as little as possible: I can't seem to agree with anything that I read anymore, even things that one can only, apparently, disagree with, have some right in them, and vice versa. I read an article and I can see that, if well written, it will naturally make you agree with them. I read very few where the opinion of the writer is so held back that you can actually form your own opinion: this isn't one of them.
I read this article http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/151508/15_year-old-girl_faces_life_in_prison_for_a_miscarriage_why_conservatives_are_criminalizing_pregnant_women and of course, it seems absurd. But carry on reading and you see that these are not "ordinary pregnant women" who are being criminalised: they are drug users. They will produce children who, if lucky enough to be healthy, will almost certainly have a tough, horrible, abusive childhood. 
The article goes on to say that it foreshadows a new way of looking at women. It says this is all related to being against abortion. To me that seems only a speculation of the writer of the article, as it has not given me any reason to think so, on the contrary.
It seems to me that they are imposing harsher laws on mothers and fathers who think they have the almighty RIGHT to cook meth and do cocaine and smoke drugs and do heroin or be alcoholics with their children in or around them. Clearly they are not perfect in their application yet and they are susceptible to abuse, as most laws in these delicate matters are.
But, I suppose, the question is: if you think these women should not be made to fear for their freedom in discouragement from abusing their children, what does that say about how you feel the children should be protected, before and after their birth?

Sunday 19 June 2011

Working on Sundays

I do try to work with the rest of my beautiful family. The fact is that they are many, and even if the little one doesn't talk to me for more than 5 minutes, which is rare, someone else will. So of course what are you going to tell them: stop sharing? stop talking to me? (which I have done, and it's crazy). So there you go, I go upstairs.
Father's day today, I see declarations of passionate love for fathers a bit all over, my dad and I, my family and I, we kind of know we care, but we never tell each other. As my sister told me, I was the onlyy one who would occasionally burst out and say christ tell me you love me! or christ you know i love you that's enough anger! (mostly to my mum).
I am constantly pervaded with feelings of love here and there left and right, to various recipients and most of them I cannot tell.
I love my family immensely, I can tell them and I do, but of course they don't always see the best part of me. I am working round the clock, and looking forward to no holiday no respite. I try to be appreciative, I am! I was happier before, truthfully, when I worked but we went out, saw friends who made me laugh and I thought cared about me... then I realise no I need to work, need to save, and we still will see friends occasionally, but mostly it's work, every day, 7/7. If not working sleep, watch a series or try and do something for one of the many members of this family. Feeding a cat mopping a floor walking the dog.
I do try to keep up with the gym, though not as everyday as I'd like it: I do have lots of work to do.
I know it won't be a constant. It seems to have no been very different in the past many years, ad when it is, we go broke very fast.
 There doesn't seem to be much choice there.
Meditation for this post, and I'm aware of it, is the man carrying a lot of sticks, in a very awkward manner.

Saturday 18 June 2011

Meditation

The problem with having everything outwardly so nice and shiny means that you can never seriously complain about everything. Some people might even accuse you outright (and then retract and say they were joking) if mention wanting anything at all, saying "how can you wish for anything else you have such good things!". Or, like someone used to say to me all the time, we are the richest very privileged few of the world, the greatest majority of the remaining population can barely eat.
Ah yes, how often have we heard this. 
But, everybody has somehting that they miss, something that makes them sad, even if a lot is good!
For me, one of these things is the dilemma: I gladly chose to be a freelance worker in order to be home for my children, but of course living in an expensive rent are like Cambridge means I have to work all the time, which in turn means quality time with the children is usually difficult to find, it means my home is a place of (a lot of) work, it means I never get the chance to read a book, play a videogame, even seeing people who live around me is not quite so easy. It means I can't get ill, or well, if I do, I have to work anyway. It also means that even going on holiday in a splendid beach town in Italy, with no accomodation expenses, where I could read, and play with my daughter on the beach, is not feasible.
When I was younger and less married and less responsible, I would find a way. I would always find a way. I guess growing up means you just kind of stop thinking about things, so your brain never gets in motion to find solutions that would come so easily, and perhaps irresponsibly, as a teenager and youth.
Now my question to myself is: Do I stop finding solutions, or fighting to get my way, because I'm older and wiser? Or is it to keep the peace, to not unsettle things? Or do I get older because I stop looking for solutions and fighting to have my way?

The card for this mediation is of course the Two of Swords.

Here's a thought

As an experiment, try to respond to whatever you have in front of you, acquaintance or dearest friend, relative or lover, says, looking only at the exact words they use, without prejudice, prejudgment, preunderstanding. Just respond to their actual words. Request people do the same with you. It's way way more difficult than you might think. But stick with it, and I'm ready to bet 90% of your relational problems and conflicts will dissolve.

Thursday 16 June 2011

Belief

You've lost me, can't you see?
believe this, no believe this! Believe that but don't believe the other...
You've lost me.
I believe no-one, I only believe, and that's no small thing,
that more people believe in their lies
or in the lies they've been told, than lie.
Which in itself is not a bad thing, I suppose.
More people are honest than you'd have thought.
But less people are objective and rational than one would hope.
You've all lost me, does it matter though?
What's my little opinion? What's my little distrust?
What's my resignation, my acceptance?
What is it to you?
The serenity I find in realising
that nothing is real, only what we feel
And people feel a lot of different things, and they vary and change depending on so much.
You're mostly just hot air and if I could shut you up,
at least on a subject or two,  if I could shut you up about it,
well, I would.

Thursday 2 June 2011

I do care.

I had a house once, a beautiful 6-story house in Arequipa, Peru. It had a garden all round, part of it was a wild miniature hill, and a brown with black legs lama called Bibo would graze there. When he first arrived he was accompanied by a white lama, called Biba, but she died, unfortunately.
I had a dog, called Churro, who was black with white paws. I remember him being very big, but perhaps he wasn't bigger than my present dog, Zoom.
I had a woman who worked for us and lived with us, her name was Gladys. My mother had a small room at the bottom of the house, where she would teach English... or study for teaching. The house was usually mostly empty, or at least I remember it so, except of course for the animals (there was also a cat who often had kittens), and Gladys, and me.
I used to love being dirty, most of the time. I would sit and explore every inch of the garden, between the blades of grass. I would sit on the tree, there was a very beautiful tree, perhaps like a willow, except not a weeping one. It was above the driveway to the house. The tree was very easy to climb and I would gladly sit there. Sheltered, and getting sticky with all the sap. It was always an incredibly peaceful place for me, up in the trees.
I would sometimes go for long walks with Churro. Sometimes we'd go out into some unknown countryside. Sometimes we'd go out into town. Sometimes we'd head down to the country club where other kids from my school would gather and play in the pool, or play sports, and I would watch, occasionally try to join in, but would soon move away from their loud and boisterous presence. More often I would go there with Churro, be unseen, hide and climb all over the cypresses round the tennis courts, or go into the wild part of the park, and go close to the horses. Sometimes they'd let me pet them, sometimes they'd bite. Nevertheless, I never got afraid of horses.
I was never sure where my parents were. And I had some vague idea that my sister was either at school or with her friends, and wasn't quite sure about my brother but probably something similar. My brother was in fact sometimes home, but  I would know this mostly cause I'd creep into his bedroom to explore, and he'd be there, so I'd go out. Sometimes I would sit with Gladys and watch her telenovelas.
I quite liked going up to the roof sometimes, but mostly, I liked to go out and walk and get lost, be invisible, well I didn't want to per se, I just was, and enjoyed it as well as didn't quite understand it, at the same time.
Sometimes we'd go on tours with the car. More often it would be me and my brother and my dad, probably that was when my mother and sister left for Italy, and I was left behind with my brother. I didn't know where exactly or why they had gone. They told me later it was so that I could finish my school, and I suppose my brother had to finish school too. And that it was because my mum and my dad had separated, but that also wasn't clear to me at all at the time. I don't recall missing my mother, she was never really there even when she was, if you see what I mean.
I would get boxes from Italy, from my mum I suppose mostly. Once a box contained a beautiful yellow dress, I loved it. It felt good, the cotton was lovely, I still remember all the millions of little creases, and the little tiny flowers. It felt nice on me too. There was nutella, usually, which I adored and seemed a bit of heaven. And "Topolino", the Italian Donald Duck magazine except the name was dedicated to Mickey Mouse.
Those boxes were such a party.
I loved going on trips with the car. Sometimes they were far and we'd sleep out, we'd sleep in the car or sleep in movable homes of some engineering project site, or in crappy hotels with cockroaches abounding on possibly flea-ridden mattresses. They felt unsafe and I knew they were. Even the people, who knew what they could do during the night. But it was always a passing thought, which left me straight away. I trusted my dad implicitly, I never worried.
I loved our trips on desolate mountain sides, lonely rocky towns in the middle of nowhere, herds of lamas and vicuñas running free, cold and very high altitudes. I loved will deserts, cold, or sometimes hot. The hot ones had dead lizards that were burnt in the sun, the cold ones had horses frozen in the act of getting up, and a dried salty lake, on which pink flamingo feathers were found once. In a surreal walk where I was then met by my brother from one direction and my dad from another, I found them and loved them and they felt so magical.
Sometimes we'd end up in lush green countryside, green mountaintops where people dressed in amazing multicolour would hold markets full of chicha morada and purple sweetcorn. Women had long black tresses and huge colourful blankets in which they wrapped and carried their babies, and they invariably smiled, they looked fat and well fed, the lot of them. The towns were quite literally breathtaking on the sides of mountains, and they looked beautiful too. Also, sometimes the deserts would be very very hot and with sand dunes. Those were the most boring ones I didn't quite fancy those, but they fun occasionally, running up the dunes after my sister once, I remember. I loved the rocky deserts most. You never knew what you'd find: a skull, a lizard, bits of humans who'd passed before.
We went to many places.
I loved that place. I loved seeing the volcano just so close, the Misti who often trembled and smoked and made our houses shudder. And the Chachani nearby. I loved climbing quite a way on it once and I loved the green green fertile countryside that surrounded it, that it created. I loved that wild nature, so strong and healthy and vibrant it would speak to me constantly. I saw a pale recollection of it in Andalucia, but it was only a pale one, and yet Andalucia is strong.
I can still make nature talk to me, but I have to sit in it, and stop, and pause. It doesn't happen often these days.
Everyday, every day of my life since I left that place, I've been wanting to go back.
That is many years now, many things have happened, many people I have met, many things I have done, many countries have I visited and lived in and every day, every day I longed to go back. Every day I waited for the day I'd go back and, later, I waited to create a place that would be a bit like it, without having to be in Peru. Because of course I realised how getting back to Peru and living the way I wanted there wouldn't be quite as easy as I envisaged when I was thirteen.
I realise people move on, change, grow out of stuff and think of other stuff. I realise I am still there, so much of me is always pulling in that direction, wanting to go back and find that place, I suppose one could call it a spiritual place as well, but that's always where I'm heading back to.
I try to surround myself with as much as is possible to either distract me from it, positively, or bring me to feel echoes of those feelings in other places. But in the end, I realise everything I do, as much as I love everything I do and everyone I do it with, is just a side thing to what is my true ambition ad it hasn't changed.
I wonder how sad is that?
I don't know, when I see people get worked up and giving importance to stuff that is meaningless to me, meaningless. Seriousness, working, cars, objects, functions, rituals. All meaningless. The only thing that matters are people, and for me to go back to that spiritual place.

I had a driver there. He was always dressed in black and was very dark himself with typical Inca features, dark dark hair and often we sat on the wild miniature hill in our garden and looked out towards Arequipa. He was always quiet, mostly sad, but rich, so rich in his presence. He had lost his wife, he finally told me one day. He was mourning her, every day. That's what he was: a man in mourning, and nothing else.
I am what I am but it's not enough. you have to be so many things these days. You have to have a role, a function, a name, an activity. Got to keep busy!
I cannot understand it anymore than you can understand what goes on in my head. I do know there are many people who feel out of place, out of sync... who might sometimes get confused about what they want or who they are. I am never really confused. I just keep swapping to things that will keep me busy and stop me from just spending the day longing to go back to that place. I try to remain useful and productive and sociable and happy and yet, I want to go back to that place and that's all that I am.
As my driver was the mourning, so am I, I am the longing.

Tuesday 24 May 2011

Thank you

Thank you for the rowers first thing in the morning,
water slushing on the Cam, never a shout.
Thanks for the wondrous empty spaces where Zoom can run
and the funny steel thing where sparrows are to nest.
Thank you laughingly taking out the little tree in front of my house
and putting some hanging baskets on the lamppost instead.

Thank you for the flowers and the scents and the willows
for the wisteria and the rose climbers all over
for the pretty houses for the college students
for the punts and the lazy cows on the Common

Thanks for the friends and thanks for the jobs
thanks for the school and thanks for the hopes
thanks for the companies and the pubs
for the libraries and the news, the swans, the ducks

Thanks for keeping in touch, thanks for feeling warm
thanks for being cosy and nice
thanks for being gentle and reassuring and
always giving me another chance.

Monday 23 May 2011

Zoom and Maggie duet

Dannata politica

Crossposto. E che anche se scritto caotica, questa e' la mia idea sulla politica e piano piano diventerà sempre più chiara. Chissà che non ci sia un modo di far diventare la democrazia una cosa meno idiota.

Era una risposta ispirata da questo post del caro gionni, ma era troppo lungo quindi lo metto qua :)

ma porca eva! Vado per leggere l'articolo e scende un lenzuolo azzurro per invitarmi a condividerlo su Facebook che mi impedisce assolutamente di leggere l'articolo! E rinfrescando la pagina non si leva, ne' c'e' nulla che me la faccia chiudere. Ti dico quel posto era il male sono felice di averlo mollato.
In tema, andando sulla fiducia visto che appunto non riesco a leggere l'articolo: proprio ieri discutevo con Paolo l'importanza di un luogo IMPARZIALE che ci dica TUTTO quel che succede. Non solo. A me sono anni che il divario destra sinistra fa salire la febbre dall'incazzatura, perché alla fine da quel che vedo come osservatore esterno e' che destra e sinistra vuol solo dire dove vado ad approfittarmi di più, che mezzi ho per farlo, e chi mi aiuterà a farlo. Prendo un esempio lontano dall'Italia per chiarire: Al Jazeera un paio di settimane fa scriveva che Obama aveva fatto non so quale terribile torto alla Palestina accettando di trattare solo con Israele in so quale contesto: allora io, che leggo solo qualche volta le cose, posso pensare: oh che peccato Obama che delusione, ti facevo cosi giusto. Ma e' un momento passeggero perché SO che la realtà e' un tutto, possibilmente da guardare con il senno di poi, e non e' solo uno stralcio di notizia. E infatti ieri Paolo mi dice che Obama ha fatto incazzare gli israeliani perché incoraggia lo stato di Palestina ai confini del 1960 o quel che e'.
E Paolo dice "Mi ha sorpreso, visto che in vece stava tradendo tutto quello che aveva promesso". Ora io dico: e' POLITICA. Al MEGLIO, uno farà come Obama: ha un obiettivo, o cinque. Nel giro di 4 o addirittura, se possibile, 8 anni, cercherà di raggiungere quegli obiettivi. Per raggiungerli, e' EVIDENTE che dovrà dare un po' di qua e un po' di la', dovrà dire no di qua per poter dire si di la'. Distratto ovviamente dal dover combattere contro questo o quello che lo intralcerà non perché l'idea sia giusta o sbagliata per il popolo, ma perché non conviene a LUI (O lei). Al meglio.
Al peggio, e in Italia siamo al peggio, ma anche, mi dicono, qui da noi in UK, abbiamo gente che vuole ottenere per se' un sacco di cose, magari, se siamo fortunati, qualcosa per il "popolo", e farà quello che e' nella sua natura per ottenerlo: quelli che mi danno l'idea di fregarsene di chiunque al di la' di loro stessi sono davvero pochi, a sinistra o a destra.
Berlusconi e' il signor egoismo. Ma, pur nel suo egoismo, negli anni ha fatto anche cose eccelse, le ha gestite bene... meglio di tanti altri che hanno come unico merito di aver una buona retorica.
Il punto e', ormai e' odiato da gente che votava a sinistra e gente che votava a destra, non so quante speranze abbia di PIACERE. Potrebbe magari ritirarsi e fare qualcosa da dietro le quinte, chesso', fare il ministro dell'impresa o della finanza, invece no, siccome e' un piacione sta in prima fila, si fa buttare addosso di tutto, e si fa le plastiche per apparire più bello.
La vanità l'ha fregato. E qualsiasi cosa di buono avesse mai potuto fare, il non capire che avrebbe dovuto stare fuori dai riflettori gli ha impedito di fare un sacco di cose che avrebbe potuto fare. Li' e' stato stupido lui. Ma il punto, di nuovo, e': basta guardare a destra o a sinistra. Diamine il tizio francese e' un pervertito del menga, ma che mi frega che e' l'unico candidato di sinistra? E' un pervertito e come tale va trattato!
La politica va aggiustata: bisogna guardare alle persone, alle qualifiche che hanno, e NON a destra o a sinistra, basta, e' roba antica, antiquata, basta destra o sinistra solo persone, come nell'industria privata, diamine!
Uff questo commento e' diventato un post. Ma insomma rimane il fatto che come in Francia, a Milano da quel poco che ho sentito di entrambi sia Pisapia che la Moratti non le posso reputare persone serie, non le reputo persone qualificate, almeno leggendo qua e la'. Googlo per capire di più e vedo solo opinioni, mai fatti. Cerco sulla BBC che, scopro recentemente, ha l'obbligo di essere imparziale, e vedo solo fatti: Moratti ha perso e questo si dice riflette male sul governo Berlusconi, dicono. Pare che senza di lei Milano sarà piena di extracomunitari, questo si dice, questo dici. Ma in giro vedo solo articoli su lei che balla e lui che mette manifesti, che diamine, ma e' davvero questo quello di cui ha bisogno la gente per votare? Ci deve essere un articolo serio da qualche parte che dica cosa entrambi dicono di voler fare per Milano, che pero' abbia anche investigato se quanto promettono sia anche possibile. E poi vorrei anche un paragrafetto che indichi che entrambi hanno le qualifiche per ottenere le cose che promettono o hanno gente in squadra che permetteranno loro di farlo. Cosa bisogna fare per cambiare la politica verso questo? Solo allora potrei averne interesse.

Sunday 22 May 2011

Why I'm leaving Facebook/Perché abbandono Facebook

A while back a friend wrote a now-famous post about why he left the world of scientific research. That was a clever, well-thought out, well-written and very noble post. This is a rant, so you've been warned.


I was introduced to Facebook by a friend of mine, back in hmmm, 2007 perhaps, and it was mainly presented as a place where it was easy to upload pictures and share stuff with people you knew. As soon as I went in there, I found people I thought I'd never hear from again, and most of them I was thrilled to have found, people life didn't give me the chance to get to know better or spend more time with, now I could finally interact with, get closer with, keep up with and it was a privilege, a joy!

In some cases, I even managed to close a few ghosts from the past, by seeing them now, removing them from my mind, finally seeing that there was nothing left to share and so on: that too was invaluable, and I was grateful to Facebook for it. These were the arguments I used FOR Facebook with people I tried to convince to sign up so that I could more easily keep up with what was happening in their lives and in their heads.

Then of course Facebook got filled up with useful distractions (bits of news, really funny stuff and so on) and some not so useful, stuff that just wasted my time (games I liked, games I didn't, games I got invited to, apps that just made me compulsively waste my time, scrolling down useless posts on my wall to get to the people I cared to know about and so on).
I still liked it, however, and it was still all worth it: every time I uploaded a video or a picture with no hassle at all, no cropping or resizing, and knew that an old dear relative would see it easily on her niece's account, I felt it was all worth it.



[As an aside keep in mind that using various apps from browsers like Firefox, I wasn't exposed to all the ads. The few times I would see Facebook without all my little blocking apps, I saw that it got more and more frightening: enormous quantity of ads, then invitations from Facebook to JOIN THIS! LIKE THAT! BE FRIENDS WITH SUCH AND SUCH! Thanks to those little apps though, I managed to keep that side, the side that is REALLY worth millions and millions of currency, under control.]

Then, of course, some ghosts from the past found ME. It was always a "free stab". In some cases, it was worth it: ghosts laid to rest, people seen for what they really are, final explanations exchanged, last words rectified in case we died and got filled with remorse. But others, they just weren't. They just appeared, and I really really didn't want them to be anywhere near me, not even have their name associated with mine.
But there was an easy way out: block them. "Block them!" I would say to my friends who had similar concerns about going on Facebook. In truth, a friend of mine who actually translated the terms and conditions in one of the languages told me he'd never go on Facebook because he really knew what the privacy terms were. I thought at the time he was a being a tad paranoid, after all I had nothing to hide from any government, not even the American one.
Now I see that those people I convinced to come online saying "just block them", I have to say "ah by the way that's no longer sufficient". And other people for whom I am the common friend with someone they really really really don't want to see again, are no longer safe in just blocking, since there are occasions were people you have blocked can see you, particularly on common friends' walls, even though YOU continue not to see them.

Some friends suggested it might be one of those untrue hypes, a typical internet hoax. Besides another friend saying he did some tests and found it to be true, I realised that you know what? Even if it isn't true now, from past experience of their changes of privacy policy that I needed to keep up with and change my settings in order to retain the level of privacy I wanted, I didn't know how many things I might have missed or was already unwittingly doing that might damage my friends' privacy requirements and how many more here would be in the future.

So, that's it. Goodbye Facebook. There's only so many times you can lose and regain trust.
















Un po' di tempo fa un amico scrisse un post, ora famoso, sul perché lasciasse il mondo della ricerca scientifica. Quello era un pezzo intelligente, scritto bene e molto nobile. Questa é una sfuriata. Siete stati avvertiti.

Facebook mi era stato presentato da un amico nel 2007, ed era stato presentato soprattutto come un luogo dove era facile caricare foto e video su un server e condividere cose con persone che conoscevi. Appena entrata, vi trovai delle persone che pensavo non avrei mai più sentito, e la maggior parte ero felicissima di aver trovato, persone che la vita non mi diede il tempo di frequentare, conoscere meglio. Ora finalmente potevo avvicinarmici, rimanere aggiornata ed era un privilegio, una gioia!

In alcuni casi, sono anche riuscita a chiudere con qualche fantasma del passato: vedere come sono ora, togliendomeli dalla testa, finalmente vedendo che non rimaneva nulla da condividere e così via. Anche quello era preziosissimo, ed ero grata a Facebook per questo. Questi erano gli argomenti che utilizzavo per convincere alcune persone ad iscriversi, anche per poter più facilmente aggiornarmi su quello che succedeva nella loro vita e nelle loro teste.

Poi chiaramente Facebook si è riempita di distrazioni utili (pezzetti di notizie, cose davvero divertenti e così via), e alcune meno utili che si limitavano a farmi perdere tempo (giochi che mi piacevano, giochi che non mi piacevano, giochi a cui venivo invitata, scorrere giù sulla mia bacheca a trovare gli aggiornamenti delle persone che mi interessava davvero leggere e cosi via).
Tuttavia, continuava a piacermi, ne valeva ancora la pena: ogni volta che caricavo un video o una foto senza alcuno sforzo, senza tagliare o aggiustarne la grandezza, e sapevo che qualche anziano parente sarebbe riuscito a vederlo comodamente dal profilo della nipote, mi sentivo che valeva davvero la pena.

[Come nota a parte dovete tenere in mente che grazie a molte piccole applicazioni dei browser come Firefox, non ero esposta a tutta la pubblicità. Le poche volte che vedevo Facebook senza i miei trucchetti protettivi la quantità di pubblicità, gli inviti a CLICCA QUA! DI CHE TI PIACE QUESTO! CONNETTI CON QUEST'ALTRO! erano spaventose. Grazie a tutte quelle piccole applicazioni, però, riuscivo a mantenere quel lato, quel lato che DAVVERO vale milioni di dollari, sotto controllo.]

Poi, naturalmente, dei fantasmi del passato hanno trovato ME. Era sempre una "coltellata gratuita": in alcuni casi, ne valeva la pena: fantasmi finalmente in pace, persone viste per quel che sono, ultime spiegazioni scambiate, ultime parole dette rettificate nel caso uno di noi morisse e dovesse vivere col terribile rimpianto. Ma in altri casi, semplicemente non valeva la pena. Apparivano così, e davvero non volevo che mi si avvicinassero in alcun modo, nemmeno avere il mio nome associato al loro. Ma c'era una facile via di scampo: bloccarli. "Bloccali!, dicevo ai miei amici che avevano simili preoccupazioni riguardo all'andare su Facebook.
A dire il vero, ci sarebbe un amico che mi aveva detto che non sarebbe mai andato su Facebook in quanto ne tradusse tutte le condizioni di privacy e quindi le conosceva nel dettaglio. All'epoca pensavo fosse semplicemente un tantino paranoico, dopo tutto io non avevo nulla da nascondere a nessun governo, manco quello Americano. Ma ora vedo che a tutte quelle persone che ho convinto a venire online dicendo "bloccali, semplicemente" ora devo dire "ehm, non è più esattamente sufficiente, mi spiace". E altre persone per cui sono io l'amico comune di persone con cui davvero davvero non vogliono avere più nulla a che fare, non sono più al sicuro semplicemente bloccandoli.

Alcuni amici hanno suggerito che fosse l'ennesima bufala che vuole condurre al panico su Facebook. A parte che altri amici hanno detto di aver fatto delle prove ed effettivamente hanno riscontrato che è vero, che anche gli utenti bloccati, se interagisci sulla bacheca di un amico comune, ti possono vedere (ma tu continui a non vedere loro) mi sono resa conto che sapete cosa? Anche se non fosse vero ora, ci sono stati abbastanza cambi improvvisi alla politica sulla privacy in passato con i quali ho dovuto aggiornarmi e cambiare impostazione per mantenere il livello di privacy che volevo io, senza contare quelli che mi sono magari sfuggiti e quindi stavo magari danneggiando quelli di amici senza saperlo e quelli che arriveranno in futuro, che non importa.

Quindi addio, Facebook. C'è un limite a quante volte puoi tradire e riconquistare la fiducia.




Wednesday 4 May 2011

no thought

I love it when lots of work comes in, so much that it suffocates all my time and all my thoughts. I love silencing my head.

Thank you,
for always thinking the best of me,
for seeing me for better than I feel.
For reassuring me despite my aggression.

A grateful tiger.

Poem

Find me a name, just define me.
As I inspire you you might just find me,
don't leave me by the side as you go running,

turn around and call me
by name and tell me,
You Are. And define me.

Wednesday 20 April 2011

The veiled curse of Hope


I could write a book about the importance of (free) will as opposed to hope. I might in the end but because this is the internet and I do have a family to look after, I'm going to have to do it a little at a time, in bits scattered here and there.
When we hope, we give power to some outside source to change what is happening in our life. That outside source can be life in general, (so, unspecific sources of events), people (the interviewer for our new job, the policeman who will decide whether to let us go or not), or, it can be a supernatural being (God, a saint, a fairy).
If we look at it that way, we see that a synonym for hope is delegate. Imagine replacing one word for another all the time:
"I hope it will be sunny tomorrow"="I delegate to the Earth to make it sunny tomorrow". It makes sense. We still haven't invented Gyro Gearloose's weather making machine.
"I hope they will give me that job"="I delegate to the people I interviewed with to decide for me for that post". This kind of makes sense too, as long as there is an awareness that you have done what you could to influence that outcome, and now it is someone else's turn to do their job and decide about you.
"I hope my new boyfriend won't make me suffer"="I delegate my new boyfriend to ensure my lack of suffering". This starts making my ears itch. You are delegating the job to ensure your lack of suffering to someone else? You are removing from yourself the responsibility to contribute to the relationship in a  productive way, to keep an eye and ear out for your partner's behaviour to see how he's feeling about you both, and choosing to be blind to the flaws he has that will most likely lead to your suffering. From my point of view, your suffering is therefore ensured.
However, this can be changed a little, to mean "I hope this relationship works out well", and then it can become acceptable: you are not delegating, assuming you are aware that you will put all your best efforts in the relationship and hope that your partner does the same. There is only so much you can do to ensure he puts in his best efforts too.
"I hope God will change my life"="I delegate a supernatural being to do all that is necessary, big and small, to change my life. Even decide in what way I want to change it".
This might occur in the form of a prayer for something definite. "Please God give me the strength to face that interview". In this case you might be performing some kind of meditation that helps you focus on what you will do.  Prayers work a little like hypnosis, or eastern forms of focusing: at first you pray a lot to get to that state of mind, then all you need is a "power phrase" in your mind to get you going. However, the belief in a supernatural being can be brought to a very dangerous place. The place where you delegate everything to this all-powerful being. 
This is bad enough, but when that supernatural being is not even in direct contact with you (and therefore you can pretty much imagine him or her to be able to do, or want to do, anything you want, so it works, as I said, more as a meditation that leaves you in control), but is actually interpreted through a person (a priest), you can immediately see how terribly dangerous it is to delegate your happiness, your decisions, your choices and how you feel about yourself to a person that not only you are delegating with the power over you. He is at the same time supposedly delegating power to this supernatural being, and telling you what this supernatural being, now in charge of you and your destiny, wants, wishes, decides.

We as humans clearly have a disposition towards giving up responsibility for our actions, for our lives. It must be a remnant of the fear we must have experienced as animals, or more recently as when we were  helpless babies: we had to struggle to stir events in our favour (cry to get food, shelter, protection, and so on, or hunt constantly, or run in fear). We deep down love the idea of being looked after, being dependant on fates, other people, the whims of nature. Somehow, just like abused people return to be abused, we feel reassured by the repetition of a condition that may have been unpleasant, but we knew it, we were familiar with it.

That is the problem of course. Accepting responsibility for our actions, the consequences of the same and the end result of each and every day of our lives, takes heaps of courage because it forces us to admit we do not know how things will turn out. We can try our best and aim as straight and true as possible, but we may have gotten our targets completely wrong and cause completely unplanned and unforeseen things to happen. People who stride into life with apparent confidence, take control over the same and are always changing, revolutionising and experimenting, strike us as "bold", or sometimes even arrogant! We envy them, secretely, and despise them at the same time. These feelings were reinforced and taught to us by many many religions, who have taken the deeper, purest meaning of spiritual belief and inspiration, and have turned it into into a massive, devastating control tool.

If we are meek, as sheep, and delegate our lives to outside forces, whichever they are, we are safe: someone knows better than us.

This leads to a greater discussion about religion, which I will tackle bit by bit. But my aim now is to point out that by merely swapping the words, from "hope" to "delegate", we can see whether that hope is positive thinking about the future (which is of course fine), or whether we are relinquishing responsibility: which is still fine, of course, we are free to do as we please. BUT it removes our right to shake our fists in the air and get mad at someone else if things didn't go our way later.


Tuesday 19 April 2011

A book for free: The Night Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko

I will start keeping track of the books I read, with a review: if you like the book or think someone will like it, just send me enough for postage via paypal at valsarno at gmail dot com and I'll send it to you, for free. Or perhaps if I'm feeling generous (and rich), I'll even pay for postage.

This is the Amazon link for this book: The Night Watch

 (By they way, image comes from interesting link about London Book Fair and Russian Lit, too. I hope they don't mind my using it).


This is the first of a series of books my friend Toby Deveson says are increasingly brilliant. I might mention this guy a lot: keep in mind the most amazing books I have ever read mostly came from his suggestions or deliberate book sending. I believe few things are/should be a most welcome gift than books, and I have enormously appreciated his effort to educate and drown me in the otherwise unaffordable (at various times) beauty of the written word, which is why I am inspired to continue his lovely habit.  

The Night Watch is a book about Others, people who have awareness of the underlying world of magic called the Twilight, and have the ability to manipulate these underlying energies either for good or for evil. Of course, as one would assume, the line between what we'd consider good and what we'd consider evil is very very fine and at times quite blurred, so the book revolves mostly around this speculation.
There is indeed a hell of a lot of speculation in this book: the main character Anton, a Light Other (meaning he is there to enforce the treaty that prevents good ones from doing too much good and bad ones from doing too much bad), speculates A LOT about whether one action is good or evil and about all the machinations and manipulations of his boss and older, wiser magicians, to ensure good  (supposedly, or hopefully) is done through the years. I must admit some of that speculating you want to skip over, and dear Anton comes across as a bit of a drag. Sometimes.
The other thing Anton does a lot is try to figure out where these manipulations and deceptions are actually occurring. This is an extremely frustrating aspect of it, possibly the principal aspect. The consideration that the evil side's (The Day Watch) point of view is somewhat preferable because at least they are open (or you expect them to lie) is often put forward, presumably setting up the premise for the next book in the trilogy, the Day Watch (which I won't link because I haven't read it yet and don't wish for spoilers).
Another source of frustration for both our main character (but not, oddly, for other Light ones?) and us readers is that they can do so much good... but they can't. There is a treaty in force which actively stops both Light and Dark ones form acting out their natures... and the Night and Day Watch respectively  enforce that treaty policing each other. But fun does talk place anyway, don't worry.

On the whole, if you manage to skim read or stomach all the speculating and the frustration of figuring out the machinations and not being able to trust other main characters, the actions and adventures are quite engaging. The ending is almost cheesy, but on the whole it did leave me wanting to read the next one in the series... tough not quite as urgently as, say, a Harry Potter (it was the back book cover that draws that comparison in the first place... JK Rowling... Russian Style. Ah, give me a break . If anything that sort of comment would have put me off buying it in the first place! A book that is sort of like another one but different is never very promising).


Monday 18 April 2011

New yous


I want to change jobs.
Seems easy to say, doesn’t it? You know you’re doing one thing, and you want to do something else.
Now, I work form home as a translator. So, one would think, that’s even easier, right? I mean you don’t have to send any letters of resignation, no awkward goodbyes, no fear of unhelpful recommendations. You just, well, change jobs.

I could say that it’s difficult to think about working in a different location than your home because you suddenly have to rethink the very way you bring up your children, the way you pay for childcare, your wardrobe and the fact you can’t get away with making a constant mess of your hair anymore. You will need a hairdresser. But that’s all shields. The truth is, I no longer know how to interact with people I don’t choose to.
I have become intolerant, in my isolation, of many qualities in people that I never quite liked or understood anyway, only now I could actually choose to not frequent those people who possessed those qualities. And these people were: greedy, materialistic, mean, plain evil, shallow as puddles, dull, uninteresting, obstinate, prejudiced, intolerant of any diversity, obtuse, prevaricating, quick to anger, resentful, demanding, focused on exterior appearance, and many many other qualities I find insufferable (even when they surface in me!).
Of course we are human beings. I dislike a great quantity of human beings, that is the sad truth. Therefore, I know there is a high chance that working anywhere, I would come across and have to frequent on a steady basis some or even lots of these people (depending on how big the company is, but the smaller it is, the greater the risk it is made up SOLELY of those sorts of people).
So I cannot really see myself working outside my home anymore.

I am possibly the clumsiest and least organised person you know. So, my idle thought of making jewellery for a living remains that: an idle thought.
I am not disciplined enough to write a book, as I always wanted to: I get bored very quickly and find it hard to find the time. Plus I do need to earn money so I carry on working and in my rare free time I prefer not to carry on working.

So I don’t suppose I have much choice, and so I will approach this writing business from another point of view.
We mostly tend to write about stuff when stuff is bad. When stuff is good in certain areas, (but stuff is never good in ALL areas, is it? Or is it?), I think most people tend to prefer to write less about themselves, because, and it’s true, most people feel GUILTY in saying “I have made good choices that have led me to a relatively privileged life”.
Well I have decided it’s ok to write about it. After all, I would have loved to have read about someone like me when I felt trapped and miserable and lonely and all the rest of it.
So I will start sharing thoughts on how you can be talentless and difficult as a person, yet be entitled to a decent life anyhow.
Not today though, I must take my daughter to the playground after lunch.

Sunday 6 February 2011

Questions I ask myself

I saw this
On Sun 6th February, why not spend an evening hearing the engaging stories and anecdotes of one of Britain's most prominent journalists
Published: 2011-02-06 09:30:00 GMT
 
 
recommended to me
by a good page on Facebook that shows me Local stuff going on in Cambridge:

I was about to comment once more how wonderful it is to live in a place where there is always something interesting to do, somewhere. For example, on Tuesday night I will take courage and go and listen to a fantastic man, surrounded by people who mostly will know what he's talking about, and my challenge is of course to understand as much as possible: you see, I have always been fascinated by Maths and Physics and Science in general. I loved it, but I've always been crap at learning things by heart, and solving formulas: I adored the process, but alas, the results were always wrong.
We're going to hear this man, Sir Roger Penrose:

If you have a question about this talk, please contact jr482.
Sir Roger Penrose proposed recently to have found evidence for a Pre-Big Bang Universe. He is a mathematical physicist and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford and Emeritus Fellow of Wadham College. He has received a number of prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize for physics which he shared with Stephen Hawking for their contribution to our understanding of the universe. He is renowned for his work in mathematical physics, in particular his contributions to general relativity and cosmology.
FREE for everybody! Doors open at 7.40pm


Yes, you read right, it says: FREE for everybody!

So, thinking perhaps I might ask my husband and our friend whether they might be interested in hearing talks form this journalist, just for the hell of being able to say "I hear a different very interesting person talk every other day in Cambridge", I went to check out the page, and lo and behold, the price to hear this


Writing for The Scotsman and The Guardian before moving across to BBC Radio, his wide-ranging career has taken him all over the world, placed him on the front row of major events, and brought him into contact with a whole range of famous figures. It has given him a whole trove of stories and anecdotes to share. 7.45pm, Sunday 6th February. Cambridge Arts Theatre. £22.50


was 22.50!!!!

It seems to me that talking about your job should not be something we pay for. It is the one good thing you could do, be an inspiration and source of delight and interest to so many.
I initially thought I could bring my son D. (13) to hear the journalist, as my son K. (15 soon) is coming with us to hear Penrose, while the other one babysits, I thought D. would love to hear what being a journalist is all about. It might have given him inspiration for future work: he is 13 and so skilled in many subjects, but seems more keen on the Humanities side, so what an excellent opportunity! But we're taking him to see Macbeth, which he is studying in school, that is already an expense and between Macbeth and Mr Naughtie I have had to choose Macbeth.

And though I am immensely grateful for the opportunity of entering some of my passions without having to pay expensive college fees, I agree with our dear friend Kev last night who had expected to hear that tickets for Sir Penrose would already have been sold out, and was pretty shocked to hear that going to listen to him was FREE.





 

Monday 31 January 2011

Dark horse

If I could dream a dream of custard creams
I would dream of violet roses instead
If I could dream a dream of electric guitars
I know I would be musically acclaimed by far
and when raisins are sour and mattresses dour
then you know you’ve gone way too far

Pink crystal

But, why not, also winter cross-country
skiing through pink dawn snow
stopping breathing vapour
watching huffing deer venturing near lakes
magical crystals glittering on trees
friends nearby with warm wooden stoves.

Searching for haiku

Could that be why one writes poems,
Is it through lack of time?
Let me write a poem then
And express my need
My need to fly to open countries
My need to walk across deserts and sleep on warm rocks
See lizards sunbathing
And sunsets heating, and colourful rocks.